Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 S.W.3d 156 - McGee v. State

McGee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 232nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Brinegar v. United States · Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Sharpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is clear from the record that appellant's arrest was warrantless.”). The McGee case dealt with the issue only in passing, however, and did not detail what evidence demonstrated the arrest was warrantless. See id. Nor did the McGee case discuss our holdings in cases such as Telshow ; it relied solely on the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Russell. See id. at 161. 3 . The Court states that the appendix contains”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A peace officer may arrest an offender without a warrant for any offense committed in his presence or within his view.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.