Guzman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 184th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Gainous v. State · Waddell v. Hon. Court of Appeals ex rel. First District of Texas · Ex Parte Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever the court determines that a defendant charged with a felony or a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment is indigent or that the interests of justice require representation of a defendant in a criminal proceeding, the court shall appoint one or more practicing attorneys to defend him. An attorney appointed under this subsection shall represent the defendant until charges are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, appeals are exhausted, or the attorney is relieved of his duties by the court or replaced by other counsel (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hudspeth v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.