Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 S.W.3d 641

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-05-16

Relies on State v. Jones

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2021

6 state decisions

40200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Alphonso Jones (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant’s convictions for murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994, in State v. Jones, 959 S.W.2d 829, 831 (Mo.App.1997).

¶3We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/23/sw3d/641 · .json · Public domain