Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 SW3D 910 - Nunn v. State

Nunn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Reynolds v. State · Copas v. State · Sams v. State · Weston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The second, or “prejudice,” requirement, ... focuses on whether counsel’s constitutionally ineffective performance affected the outcome of the plea process. In other words, in order to satisfy the “prejudice” requirement, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.