Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Tenn. 254

Clark v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1843

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1843-12-15

Clark was indicted for perjury in the Circuit Court of Wilson county, and his case was submitted to a jury; Judge S. Anderson presiding. The defendant was on bail and was not ordered into the custody of an officer when the trial began, but was permitted to go at large. The jury came into court for the purpose of giving in their verdict. The defendant, not being present, was called and did not appear.

Decided 1843-12-15

Turley, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2At the May term, 1842, of the Circuit Court for Wilson county, the plaintiff in error was tried, and convicted for the offence of perjury, and appeals to this court. Upon argument, several points are made for reversal, only one of which we think it ne-. cessary to notice, as that is conclusive upon the case. When the verdict was rendered, the prisoner was not present, having-been permitted to go at large during his trial. _ He was called, but did not appear. Can a verdict so rendered in a case of felony be sustained? Assuredly not. In favor of life and liberty, a man charged shall be present when a verdict affecting the one or the other is to be rendered against him, for perchance he may be able to show cause against it.

¶3And so is the law as long since expounded. Chitty, in the first volume of his work upon Criminal Law, says, “The ver-*255diet, whatever may be its effect, must in all cases of felony and treason be delivered in the presence of the defendant in open court, and cannot be either privately given or promulgated while he is absent.” Coke Lit. 227; 3 Inst. 117; Sir Thomas Raymond, 198; 2 Hale, 300; Hawk. b. 2, c. 47, s. 2; 4 Black. Com. 340; Bacon’s Abridg. Verdict; Burns’s Justice, Juror. V.

¶4We therefore reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court, set aside the verdict, and remand the case for a new trial.

/23/tenn/254 · .json · Public domain