Theismann v. Theismann

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 31, 1996

Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 1996-12-31

Relies on 22 Va. App. 557 - Theismann v. Theismann

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2018

24 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1UPON REHEARING EN BANC.

¶2By opinion dated June 18,1996, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 471 S.E.2d 809 (1996). Upon motion of Joseph R. Theismann, we granted a rehearing en banc. Upon such rehearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel’s majority opinion, and, accordingly, the stay of this Court’s June 18, 1996 mandate is lifted.

¶3Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder and Annunziata would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel’s dissenting opinion. See id. at 574, 471 S.E.2d at 817 (Annunziata, J., concurring in part, and dissenting in part).

¶4This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.'