Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Va. App. 715 - Spivey v. Commonwealth

23 Va. App. 715 - Spivey v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Newland v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, a confidential and reliable informant had observed a recent drug sale at defendant’s residence, an activity common to the premises, where defendant reputedly possessed a handgun. Defendant’s son and drug supplier, Duane, resided nearby, was often at defendant’s home and had been arrested two days previously for shooting into an unoccupied vehicle. When the warrant was executed Duane’s whereabouts were unknown to the police. The officers were, therefore, cognizant that two firearms were possibly present in the residence, each in the possession of a drug dealer, one of whom had recently been charged with a weapons violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While violations of state procedural statutes are viewed with disfavor, ... neither the Virginia Supreme Court nor the legislature has adopted an exclusionary rule for such violations [ ] ... where no deprivation of the defendant’s constitutional rights occurred. [Historically, searches or seizures made contrary to provisions contained in Virginia statutes provide no right of suppression unless the statute supplies that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.