Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 VT 279 - Skiff v. Solace

Skiff v. Solace’s Empirical Analysis

1851

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
November 1921
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1921

10 state decisions

3018511860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ingraham v. Geyer · Woodward v. Gates · Soper v. Sumner · Batchelder v. Warren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But such recognition does not take place by any foreign state, when it would be incompatible with its own authority, or prejudicial to the interests of its own subjects.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.