Dane v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 1996 · most notably King v. Uhlmann (1968), State ex rel. Peel v. Clausen (1917)
6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sadler v. Niesz · Littell & Smythe Manufacturing Co. v. Miller · Calhoun v. Leary · Sagmeister v. Foss · Hardy v. Herriott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such persons as purchase without knowledge of the existence of the marriage relation, or who could not, with reasonable diligence, have obtained such knowledge.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Under the statutes of this state a mortgage of real property does not convey to the mortgagee the title to the mortgaged premises, either before or after condition broken. A mortgage is a lien simply, a mere security for the payment of money, and is satisfied and extinguished by the payment of the money for which it is given as security at any time before the sale of the mortgaged premises under a judgment or decree of foreclosure. After condition broken, the statutes confer on the mortgagee the right to have the amount due him by reason of the broken condition determined by a judgment or decree of a court, the mortgage foreclosed, and the mortgaged property sold at public auction, and the proceeds of the sale applied in satisfaction of the amount found due.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gerber v. Heath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.