Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Wash. 2d 678 - State v. Collier

23 Wash. 2d 678 - State v. Collier’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2012

18 state decisions

9019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wheeler v. United States · Meade v. Commonwealth · 52 Cal. App. 765 - People v. Delaney · State v. Bailey · Leahman v. Broughton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The mode of administering an oath, or affirmation, shall be such as may be most consistent with and binding upon the conscience of the person to whom such oath, or affirmation, may be administered."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This constitutional provision gives a wide discretion as to the mode of administering an oath. The administering officer is, in fact, commanded to employ that mode which he believes will be most binding upon the conscience of the witness. It is clearly not within the power of the legislature to prescribe a set form and require its use in every instance, and, in our opinion, it has not attempted to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Appellant’s objection to the action of the court in permitting the witness to testify without being sworn is raised for the first time on this appeal. Moreover, it is neither contended on this appeal, nor does the record suggest, that the fact was not known to appellant early enough so that he could have made timely objection. Under the circumstances, it comes too late.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.