Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Wash. App. 377 - State v. Yuen

23 Wash. App. 377 - State v. Yuen’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 80 Wash. 2d 293 - Friedlander v. Friedlander · 60 Wash. 2d 21 - State v. Johnson · 79 Wash. 2d 699 - State v. Music

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) On motion of the prosecuting attorney if: (ii) the state's evidence is presently unavailable, the prosecution has exercised due diligence, and there are reasonable grounds to believe that it will be available within a reasonable time; or (iii) required in the due administration of justice and the defendant will not be substantially prejudiced in the presentation of his defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge can impartially observe and appraise the impact of inadmissible testimony upon the jury. His discretionary judgment that a corrective instruction and admonition effectively cures an error should be respected by the appellate court unless the record demonstrates that beyond a reasonable doubt the refusal to grant a new trial denied the defendant a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As to due diligence, it is undisputed that the officers were under subpoena. While it would have been better had the prosecutor kept in closer contact with the witnesses, the State complied with the basic requirement of due diligence — the issuance of subpoenas to the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.