Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 WIS2D 213 - Klabacka v. Schott

Klabacka v. Schott’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Galster v. First National Bank of Kenosha · Abrams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Guardianship of Messer · Henes v. State Department of Public Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a guardian may employ an attorney to collect funds belonging to the estate of the ward, which attorney may be of the guardian’s choosing, the necessity of the attorney’s services and the amount of his fee are subject to the determination of the court having jurisdiction of the guardianship. Attorney’s fees under sec. 319.24, Stats., are considered an expense of the guardian and are allowed in a reasonable amount in his account if the legal services were necessary for the proper performance of the guardian’s duty. [Citations and footnotes omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.