Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 WYO 445 - Hanson v. Shelburne

Hanson v. Shelburne’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2013

8 state decisions

2019151920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cluck v. State · Long v. State · Monaghan v. Pacific Rolling Mill Co. · Peterson v. Skjelver · Grottkau v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the well-settled rule that a party having knowledge of misconduct of a juror or of the opposite party during the progress of the trial and before it has been submitted to the jury, must promptly call it to the attention of the court or it is waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.