Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably Gautney v. State (1969), 511 So. 2d 225 - Nelson v. State (1986)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Capital Traction Co. v. Hof · Moulton v. State · Miller v. State · Bluett v. State · Andrews v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(I)t is the duty of the presiding judge, at all times (unless under circumstances or at a time when his presence may be and is waived) during the progress of a trial — of which the argument to the jury is an important part of due process — to remain on the bench and in the presence and hearing of the trial and argument to the jury, to see that the trial proceeds in an orderly manner and in accordance with law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The reasons for this rule are stated by the Iowa court, as follows: `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“State v. Carnagy , 106 Iowa, 483 , 487 , 76 N.W. 805 .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.