Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ala. 310 - Dillon v. Hamilton

Dillon v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1999 · most notably Burns v. State (1944), McGraw Electric Company v. Lewis & Smith Drug Co. (1955)

28 state decisions

901935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Stiles · State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Merrill · Gibson v. State · Birmingham Electric Co. v. Harry · Tayloe v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A statute] cannot be divided so that a part will be local and a part general requiring notice as to a part, and none as to the balance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.