Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ark. 821 - Boone v. State

Boone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2006

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

80195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adamson v. People of State of California · Penton v. State · Moore v. State · Smith and Parker v. State · Polk v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The design of the lawmakers in the enactment of this statute was to protect defendants on trial as well as the State, after causes have been finally submitted to the jury for its deliberation and verdict, against any further steps being taken in the case in regard to the evidence or the law unless in open court and after notice to the counsel of the respective parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““After the jury retires for deliberation, if there is a disagreement between them as to any part of the evidence, or if they desire to be informed on a point of law, they must require the officer to conduct them into court. Upon their being brought into court, the information required must be given in the presence of, or after notice to, the counsel of the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It thus appears undisputed that appellant agreed to the court’s entering the jury room, as indicated, and he points to no evidence in the record tending to show that anything was said or done prejudicial to the rights of appellant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.