Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Cal. App. 2d 813 - Buckley v. Corey

230 Cal. App. 2d 813 - Buckley v. Corey’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 108 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 18 Cal. 3d 698 - People v. Chi Ko Wong (1976), Thornton v. Dennis M. (1969)

2 federal appellate · 108 state decisions

360196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 112 Cal. App. 2d 638 - Estate of Teed · 55 Cal. 2d 714 - People v. Keener · People v. Braun · People v. Valenti · 14 Cal. 2d 693 - People v. Waller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judgment in a proceeding under Section 300 may be appealed from in the same manner as any final judgment, and any subsequent order may be appealed from as from an order after judgment; ...”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any parent or other person having an interest in a child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court ... may, upon grounds of change of circumstances or new evidence, petition the court ... for a hearing to change, modify, or set aside any order of court previously made or to terminate the jurisdiction of the court.... [¶] If it appears that the best interests of the child may be promoted by the proposed change of order or termination of jurisdiction, the court shall order that a hearing be held....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`it was the legislative intent to make appealable any order of a juvenile court after judgment which affects the substantial rights of the juvenile....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.