Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 CALRPTR3D 771 - Eng v. Brown

Eng v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 8 Cal. 4th 548 - Soule v. General Motors Corp. · 1 Cal. 3d 93 - Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. · 46 Cal. 2d 715 - Desny v. Wilder · 33 Cal. 4th 780 - Cassim v. Allstate Insurance · People v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is elementary that a court may refuse a party's request for a jury instruction that misstates the law. 'A trial court has no duty to modify or edit an instruction offered by either side in a civil case. If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it.' [Citations.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.