Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 CONN 24 - State v. Colon

State v. Colon’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Rivera v. Commissioner of Correction (2000), State v. Keith (1998)

32 state decisions

1201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Brown · Vereen v. United States · State v. Couture · Soares v. Vestal · State v. Roque

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the jurat is simply evidence of the fact that the affidavit was duly sworn to by the affiant, and, in the event of its omission, the fact that the affidavit was properly sworn to may be proven by other evidence’ ”) (quoting White v. State, 702 P.2d 1058, 1061 (Okla.Crim.App.1985)); Bigler v. State, 602 N.E.2d 509, 516-517 (Ind.App.1992) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Jurat' means a notarial act in which a notary public certifies that a signatory, whose identity is personally known to the notary public or proven on the basis of satisfactory evidence, has made, in the notary public's presence, a voluntary signature and taken an oath or affirmation vouching for the truthfulness of the signed document.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Our holding in J.C. Penney Properties, Inc., that a valid certificate of mechanic's lien contain a written oath, can be attributed to the statutory requirement, contained in § 49-34, that the lien certificate be recorded. . . . The oath, to be recorded, necessarily must be in writing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.