Ullmann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 district · 173 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 177 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Eldridge v. Eldridge (1998), State v. Colton (1995)
4 district · 173 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fisher v. United States · International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · LaRocca v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A communication from attorney to client solely regarding a matter of fact would not ordinarily be privileged, unless it were shown to be inextricably linked to the giving of legal advice.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]ommunications between client and attorney are privileged when made in confidence for the purpose of seeking legal advice.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“tends to prevent a full disclosure of the truth in court,”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.