Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 F.1d 945 - McDaniel v. Holland

McDaniel v. Holland’s Empirical Analysis

230 F. 945 · 1916

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1919
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Heckman v. United States · Mullen v. United States · Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United States · Goat v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"That the rolls of citizenship and of fréedmen of the Five Civilized Tribes approved by the Secretary of the Interior shall be conclusive evidence as to the quantum of Indian blood of any enrolled citizen or freedman of said tribes and of no other persons to determine questions arising under this Act and the enrollment records of the Commissioner to the Five Civilized Tribes shall hereafter be conclusive evidence as to the age of said citizen or freedman.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “application for enrollment shall be construed, for the purposes of the Government, as representing the age of the applicant at that time, and that the date of the application shall be held to be the anniversary of the date of birth except where the records show otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.