Uffelman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
230 F.2d 297 · 1956
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 1977 · most notably Yaich v. United States (1960), United States v. Evans (1970)
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from California Northern District Court)
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Macintosh · United States v. Nugent · Eagles Nj v. United States · Turpin v. Warden of the Green Haven Prison · Chernekoff v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ADVISORS TO REGISTRANTS— APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES. Advisors to registrants may be appointed by the Director of Selective Service upon recommendation of the State Director of Selective Service to advise and assist registrants in the preparation of questionnaires and other selective service forms and to advise registrants on other matters relating to their liabilities under the selective service law. Every person so appointed should be at least 30 years of age. The names and addresses of advisors to registrants within the local board area shall be conspicuously posted in the local board office.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““No person other than a registrant shall have the right to appear in person before the local board, but the local board may, in its discretion, permit any person to appear before it with or on behalf of a registrant . . . . ” 32 CFR § 1624.1 (b). (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.