Guith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
230 F.2d 481 · 1956
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2019
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 7
Relies on United States v. Hutcheson · State of New York v. United States · James Goudy v. Edward Meath · Slochower v. Board of Higher Education · Glacier County v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reserved or acquired for the use of the United States”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]ppellant's ranch, being located in 'Indian country', is on 'lands reserved ... for the use of the United States, and under exclusive ... jurisdiction thereof', within 18 U.S.C. § 7 (3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.