Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 F.2d 534 - MacDonald v. Commissioner

MacDonald v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1982
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1982

12 federal appellate ·

1001956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Illinois Northern District Court)

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co. · Commissioner v. Smith · Smolowe v. Delendo Corp. · Park & Tilford, Inc. v. Schulte · O'Malley v. Ames

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[NJeither the taxpayer nor any other person under similar circumstances would be a willing seller, with knowledge that all profits realized might inure to the benefit of the corporation, and it is doubtful if any person cognizant of the circumstances would become a willing buyer.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the shares of . . . stock, regard being had . . . to the terms of a restrictive agreement making a sale thereof impossible, did not have a fair market value, capable of being ascertained with reasonable certainty, when they were acquired by the taxpayers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.