Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 F.2d 7 - Nos 11704-11706

Nos 11704-11706’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Kennedy v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INT. ASS'N LOCAL 108 (1968), McLeod v. Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks & Assistants, Local 89, Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union (1960)

2 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

1501950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Bronson's Executor v. Chappell · Shore v. Building & Construction Trades Council · Schauffler v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States & Canada · United States v. Konovsky · Dobbs v. Zink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is to be observed that section 10(0) under which the issuing of a preliminary injunction is authorized, requires the district judge to find that there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation of the act as charged has been committed. * * * This puts a lighter burden on both the district judge and ourselves than if final findings of ultimate fact were required. That task is, of course, for the labor relations board subject to review by this Court if and when enforcement is sought here.” (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The Board need not show that an unfair labor practice has been committed, but need only demonstrate that there is reasonable cause to believe that the elements of an unfair labor practice are present.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.