Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 F.2d 749 - Kivette v. United States

Kivette v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

230 F.2d 749 · 1956

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
7
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

73 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 1999 · most notably United States v. Roselli (1970), United States v. Hoffa (1965)

73 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

43019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Rabinowitz · Agnello v. United States · United States v. Sherman · United States v. Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n such cases two questions of fact arise: (1) did the agent induce the accused to commit the offense charged in the indictment; (2) if so, was the accused ready and willing without persuasion and was he awaiting any propositious opportunity to commit the offense. On the first question the accused has the burden; on the second the prosecution has it. United States v. Sherman, 200 F.2d 880 , 882-83 (2 Cir. 1952).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.