Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

230 F.2d 949

Docket No. 12540.

Bernhardt v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 18, 1956.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-02-18

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-02-18

¶1Stanley Gelfund, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

¶2Fred W. Kaess, Willis F. Ward, U. S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal having been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of both the appellants and the ap-pellee and on the record in the case, and it appearing that the points made by the appellants are both hypertechnical and unsound and even if conceded would fail to disclose that prejudicial error inheres in any ruling of the district court, its judgment in favor of the United States against appellants jointly for $11,514.00 and for an additional $2,000.00 against each of them pursuant to the pertinent statute is affirmed.

/230/f2d/949 · .json · Public domain