Purdue Pharma Lp the Purdue Frederick Company v. Faulding Inc Faulding Pharmaceutical Co Faulding Services Inc Purepac Pharmaceutical Co Zeneca Inc’s Empirical Analysis
230 F.3d 1320 · 2000
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 14 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (2003), Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. (2007)
19 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dickinson v. Zurko · Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar · Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp. · Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc. · Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). As Ruschig makes clear, one cannot disclose a forest in the original application, and then later pick a tree out of the forest and say”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“directing the skilled artisan to the Cmax/C24 ratio or what value that ratio should exceed. See id. at 994 , 154 USPQ at 122 (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an important defining quality of the formulation, nor d[id] the disclosure even motivate one to calculate the ratio.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.