Zonell Wright Simon Vargas Tara Dixon Mario Lamboy Robert Thompson v. Rudolph Giuliani Jason Turner Gregory Caldwell Aids’s Empirical Analysis
230 F.3d 543 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Registercom Inc v. Verio Inc, US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel v. United States Department of Commerce M W US F US
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Alexander v. Choate · Doe v. Pfrommer · Irvin Dana Beal and Robert Macdonald v. Henry Stern · Otokoyama Co. v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen, as here, the moving party seeks a preliminary injunction that will affect government action taken in the public interest pursuant to a statutory or regulatory scheme, the injunction should be granted only if the moving party meets the more rigorous likelihood-of-success standard.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At base, such a suggestion must rest on the notion that the benefit provided through state Medicaid programs is the amorphous objective of “adequate health care.” But Medicaid programs do not guarantee that each recipient will receive that level of health care precisely tailored to his or her particular needs. Instead, the benefit provided through Medicaid is a particular package of health care services, such as 14 days of inpatient coverage. That package of services has the general aim of assuring that individuals will receive necessary medical care, but the benefit provided remains the individual services offered-not “adequate health care.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must establish a clear or substantial likelihood of success on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sussman v. Crawford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.