Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 F.3d 733 - Dennis Thurl Dowthitt v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

Dennis Thurl Dowthitt v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division’s Empirical Analysis

230 F.3d 733 · 2000

Citation profile

203
cited by 203 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

96 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 203 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Ward v. Hall (2010), Cannon v. Mullin (2004)

96 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

1460200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Southern District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 203 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “enough” evidence on a certain issue); Kitchens v. Johnson, 190 F.3d 698 , 703 (5th Cir.1999) ("Did counsel investigate enough? Did counsel present enough mitigating evidence? Those questions are even less susceptible to judicial second-guessing.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “By no measure can ... [the defendant] block his lawyer's efforts and later claim the resulting performance was constitutionally deficient.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.