Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 FAPPX 175 - United States v. Suggs

United States v. Suggs’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Harris v. McRae · Barnes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether [the witness’s] remarles were pronounced and persistent, creating a likelihood they would mislead and prejudice the jury; (2) the strength of the other evidence; and (3) curative action taken by the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.