230 F. Supp. 2d 1016 - Comer v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
June 2014
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Farmer v. Brennan · Brady v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“: (1) difficulty falling or staying asleep; (2) irritability or outbursts of anger; (3) difficulty concentrating; (4) hypervigilance; and (5) exaggerated startle response. Id. Dr. Krupers, however, merely speculated that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Comer v. Schriro · Comer v. Schriro“whether [Comer's] conditions of confinement constitute punishment so harsh that he has been forced to abandon a natural desire to live.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Comer v. Schriro · Comer v. Schriro“has made a competent and free choice, which `is merely an example of doing what you want to do, embodies in the word liberty.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn · Michael v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.