230 F. Supp. 2d 288 - Smith v. Lord’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden · Negron v. United States · Griffith v. United States · Patterson v. Medberry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given that the petitioner eventually filed her petition without the transcripts....”). 6 . Because the Court assumes, for purposes of this opinion only, that petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling from January 15 through March 23, 2003, the Court need not determine whether an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.