¶1 This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.
¶2 The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.
¶3 Judgment affirmed.