Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ga. App. 147 - Ezzard v. State

230 Ga. App. 147 - Ezzard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Roviaro v. United States · Thornton v. State · 226 Ga. App. 254 - Taylor v. State · 227 Ga. App. 607 - Aleman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Public policy in Georgia favors nondisclosure of the identity of an informant in the interest of the free flow of information about criminal activity. The identity of a mere tipster is privileged, but where the informer is a witness or participant, or has entrapped a defendant into committing a crime, disclosure could be material to the defense. This court has held numerous times that disclosure of an informant’s identity was required where the informant was a witness or participant whose testimony would be the only testimony available to amplify or contradict that of the [witnesses]. 15”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.