Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ga. App. 604 - Hendrix v. State

230 Ga. App. 604 - Hendrix v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 233 Ga. App. 879 - Evans v. State (1998), Watson v. State (2015)

46 state decisions

210199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Berkemer v. McCarty · 195 Ga. App. 463 - Grant v. State · Hambrick v. State · Phagan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Jury instructions must be read and considered as a whole in determining whether a charge contained error. Absent a remedial instruction, reversible error can occur if a jury charge recites the entire statutory definition of a crime, thereby informing the jury that a crime may be committed in more than one manner, when the indictment avers that the crime was committed only in one specific way. [But i]n this instance, the trial court did not err in charging the entire language of [the statute] pertaining to the offense of cruelty to children, as the jury was also given an instruction which confined the elements of the crimes charged to those material allegations in the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It constitutes an act of aggravated sexual battery for a person to penetrate intentionally and without consent the sexual organ of another with his finger or other foreign object.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.