Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ga. App. 693 - Cantrell v. State

230 Ga. App. 693 - Cantrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 278 Ga. App. 650 - Buruca v. State (2006), 233 Ga. App. 560 - Lewis v. State (1998)

26 state decisions

150199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. State · 222 Ga. App. 397 - Carter v. State · 175 Ga. App. 833 - Sypho v. State · 224 Ga. App. 190 - West v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of review for the denial of a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is the same as that for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction. To sustain the conviction, the evidence must be sufficient to authorize the jury's finding of the defendant's guilt of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]n an appeal following a conviction, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this Court determines evidence sufficiency, and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.