Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Ga. App. 749 - Taylor v. State

230 Ga. App. 749 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2016

24 state decisions

100199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Whren v. United States · 184 Ga. App. 853 - Tarwid v. State · 140 Ga. App. 727 - Benefield v. State · Sharpe v. Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “argues that any consent by him to search the car did not authorize the officers to open the [container] in which the contraband was found. He cites State v. Corley, [ 201 Ga. App. 320 ( 411 SE2d 324 ) (1991) (physical precedent only)], and State v. Diaz, 191 Ga. App. 830, 832 (2) ( 383 SE2d 195 ) (1989). Both cases are distinguishable. In each, the officer asked merely for permission to “look inside” the vehicle. The court held that the extent of the consensual investigation did not extend to the seizure and examination of any items or containers in the car, which would constitute a full-blown search. In this case, as in Thomas v. State, 201 Ga. App. 292, 293 (1) ( 410 SE2d 786 ) (1991), and Garcia v. State, 207 Ga. App. 653, 656 (1) (c) ( 428 SE2d 666 ) (1993), the defendant consented to a full-blown search of his automobile. See also Gossett v. State, 199 Ga. App. 286, 287 (1) (c) ( 404 SE2d 595 ) (1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.