Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Kan. 32 - Daniels v. Chaffee

Daniels v. Chaffee’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2020

18 state decisions

10019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc. · McDowell v. Celebrezze · Vietti v. Wayne · Slater v. Peyser · Neagle v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he time for filing post-judgment motions or taking an appeal from a final judgment entered without notice commences to run when there has been compliance with K.S.A. 60-258 and Rule No. 134.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No judgment shall be effective unless and until a journal entry or judgment form is signed by the trial judge and filed with the clerk of the court. . . . “When judgment is entered by judgment form the clerk shall serve a copy of the judgment form on all attorneys of record within three days. Service may be made personally or by mail. Failure of service of a copy of the judgment form shall not affect the validity of the judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Whenever a judge shall make a ruling on a motion or application of any kind and there are parties affected who have appeared in the action but who are not then present, either in person or by their attorneys, the judge shall cause written notice of such ruling to be mailed to the parties or attorneys forthwith.” (1987 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 72).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.