Halcomb v. Halcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1947
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Snowden · Kelly v. Fields
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In-view of the confidential relationship, and attendant circumstances, the burden was on the son to show that the transactions were freely and voluntarily entered into and devoid of inequitable incidents. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bolen v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.