State v. Compagno’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1961
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mills · State v. Dowdy · State v. Nicolosi · State v. Carter · State v. Paternostro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * It is well settled that the trial judge determines whether witnesses offered as experts are entitled to be heard in that capacity, and his ruling will not be disturbed on appeal where no error appears. Art. 466, La. Code Cr.Proc., R.S. 15:466; State v. Carter, 217 La. 547 , 46 So.2d 897 ; State v. Nicolosi, 228 La. 65 , 81 So.2d 771 ." State v. Mills, 229 La. 758 , 86 So.2d 895, 899 . See, State v. Compagno, 230 La. 657 , 89 So.2d 158 ; State v. Di Vincenti, 232 La. 13 , 93 So.2d 676 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.