Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 La. 867 - Pullen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.

Pullen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
9
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably 365 So. 2d 471 - LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1978), Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers (Casualty) Insurance (1958)

25 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

530195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. v. Stukes · Pearson v. Johnson · Continental Casualty Co. v. Pierce · 2 Wash. 2d 679 - Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Wachsmith · Webb v. American Fire & Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"III. Definition of insured: (a) With respect to the insurance for bodily injury liability and for property damage liability the unqualified word `insured' includes the named insured and, * * * any person while using the automobile and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by the named insured * * * or with the permission (of the named insured). The insurance with respect to any person or organization other than the named insured * * * does not apply: * * (2) to any employee with respect to injury or to sickness, disease or death of another employee of the same employer injured in the course of such employment in an accident arising out of the maintenance or use of the automobile in the business of such employer." (Italics ours.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.