Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 MINN 1 - Bryant v. Gustafson

Bryant v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe (2009), Flynn v. Beisel (1960)

28 state decisions

1001950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. Railroad Co. · Village of Newport v. Taylor · Bacon v. Onset Bay Grove Ass'n · Gilbert v. Emerson · In Re Petition of Schaller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * He who purchases a lot with reference to a plat is deemed to have thereby purchased, as appurtenant to the lot, all the advantages, privileges, rights, and easements which the plat represents as belonging to the lot and as belonging to the owner thereof as a resident of the platted area, and this principle is applicable not merely to the roads and streets upon which the purchased lot abuts, but to. all roads and streets of advantage or utility to the platted area as a whole.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * It is not merely the street or alley upon which the purchased lot may abut that the purchaser has the privilege of using or enjoying, but all the easements, rights, privileges, and advantages which the plat represents.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he use of the word 'person' authorizes a dedication to any number of persons, in that the singular includes the plural.”). . Maryland’s former”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.