Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 MO 138 - Rhodes v. Bell

Rhodes v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2012

23 state decisions

8019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Lionberger v. Tolle · Venable v. Wabash Western Railway Co. · Freeman v. Thompson · Scanlan v. Childs · Ex parte Gist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The powers of government shall be divided into three distinct departments — the legislative, executive, and judicial — each of which shall be confided to a separate magistracy, and no person, or collection of persons, charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of those departments, shall exercise any power properly belonging to either of the others, except in the instances in this constitution expressly directed or permitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.