Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 MO 209 - Barnard v. Keathley

Barnard v. Keathley’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
4
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably Armor v. Frey (1913), 231 Mo. App. 613 - St. Paul & Kansas City Short Line Railroad v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1937)

35 state decisions

1401910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Real Estate Saving Inst. v. Collonious · Merry v. Fremon · Dameron v. Jameson · Emmons v. Gordon · Sikemeier v. Galvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But while it is too plain for argument that partition cannot be made in contravention of a will, it does not mean that the courts have no power whatever to decree a partition among the devisees and legatees and no power to construe the meaning of a will and carry into effect its provisions, but simply means that no court either at law or in equity can order a partition contrary to the provisions of a will, that is to say, while the court will not disturb the relative claims of the various devisees and legatees named in the will, it is not shorn of its power to determine what the respective interests of the parties are and work out and decree those interests according to the principles of law or equity in the given case. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““No partition or sale of lands, tenements or hereditaments, devised by any last will, shall be made under the provisions of this article, contrary to the intention of the testator, expressed in any such will. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.