Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Mo. App. 1147 - Fleming v. Fones

230 Mo. App. 1147 - Fleming v. Fones’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1992

7 state decisions

401936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Westhues v. Sullivan · State ex rel. Kemper v. Carter · City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Montgomery · State ex rel. North & South Railway Co. v. Meier · City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The section providing for recall of elective officers does not contain any express provision for the withdrawal of signatures, however this court, with other courts in this state, has decided that this right of withdrawal does exist.” Fleming v. Fones, 230 Mo.App. 1147, 1151-1152 , 91 S.W.2d 208, 210 (1936).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.