State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gopher · State v. Greeno · State v. Sharp · State v. Waters · State v. Steward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. The evidence must have come to the knowledge of the applicant since the trial; “2. It was not through want of diligence that the evidence was not discovered earlier; “3. The evidence is so material that it would probably produce a different result upon another trial; “4. The evidence is not cumulative merely — that is, does not speak as to facts in relation to which there was evidence at the trial; “5. The application must be supported by the affidavit of the witness whose evidence is alleged to have been newly discovered, or its absence accounted for; and “6. The evidence must not be such as will only tend to impeach the character or credit of a witness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Goodwin““Following a verdict or finding of guilty, the court may grant the defendant a new trial if required in the interest of justice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Goodwin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.