Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on Wiencek-Adams v. Adams · 102 N.C. App. 199 - Atkins v. Atkins · 210 N.C. App. 319 - Robinson v. Robinson · Seifert v. Seifert · 113 N.C. App. 725 - Bishop v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he standard of review on appeal from a judgment entered after a non-jury trial is whether there is competent evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact and whether the findings support the conclusions of law and ensuing judgment. The trial court's findings of fact are binding on appeal as long as competent evidence supports them, despite the existence of evidence to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o competent evidence was offered as to the value of this item. ... The Plaintiff argued the Court should rely on [the] Defendant's estimation of his monthly retirement income, should he retire in 2012, as proof of overall net value. There was no evidence offered as to the Defendant's basis for his estimation or how the Defendant calculated his estimation. ... [T]he Court does not have sufficient competent evidence to attempt to value the Defendant's retirement. The Court must determine a value supported by evidence in the record. ... Therefore, the Court finds, due to the lack of competent evidence, it is unable to value this item and it cannot be considered as part of equitable distribution. However, the Court will consider this item as a distributional factor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abdeljabar v. Khalil“[i]t was [the] plaintiff who sought to have [the] defendant's pension classified as marital property, who had the burden of showing that it was marital property, and of presenting evidence to support a valuation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abdeljabar v. Khalil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.