Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 Neb. 653 - State v. McArthur

State v. McArthur’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Churchill · State v. Golden · State v. Golden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the record is devoid of any explanation for the increase in the minimum sentences. Therefore, the increased minimum sentences cannot withstand constitutional due process scrutiny and must be modified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.