Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 NJSUPER 261 - State v. Wilkins

State v. Wilkins’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2018

5 state decisions

301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Manuszak · 75 N.J. Super. 480 - State v. Wasserman · State v. Wasserman · 168 N.J. Super. 394 - State v. Serio · 193 N.J. Super. 334 - State v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]t any time before the discharge of the defendant or the termination of the period of ... probation: .... (2) A probation officer or peace officer, upon request of the chief probation officer or otherwise having probable cause to believe that the defendant has failed to comply with a requirement imposed as a condition of the order or that he has committed another offense, may arrest him without a warrant. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:45-3(a)(2).]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “without bail pending a determination of the charge by the court having jurisdiction thereof.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed another offense or if he has been held to answer therefor,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.